» Topics » Questions »Why does the electric motor consume current?

Why does the electric motor consume current?

This is an area of ​​personal reflection. Let's say we have a brush motor with magnets. If you spin it, it works like a generator. If voltage is applied, it works like a motor.
[media = https: //youtu.be/RHxHsjAGUHA]

So, if you slow down such an engine during operation, its current consumption grows and everything is logical, because the law of conservation of energy applies. The more we brake, the more it consumes current, but why?

In fact, the anchor consists of coils, and the coil is a piece of wire, in other words, we create a short circuit by passing current through such a coil (roughly speaking).
So, if we fix the anchor, the current consumption will be monstrous, close to the short circuit. But what happens when the anchor rotates at idle? The fact is that during operation this engine works simultaneously and as a generator. That is, the anchor turns and at the same time reverse currents arise that compensate for the costs. And when we slow down the anchor, the costs are no longer fully compensated, and the current costs increase. I wonder, is it not?

Theoretically, any electric motor should work like this.
Question \ topic is automatically published in the social. site network - stay tuned for answers there:

Suitable for topic

Related topics

Add a comment

    • smilesmilesxaxaokdontknowyahoonea
      bossscratchfoolyesyes-yesaggressivesecret
      sorrydancedance2dance3pardonhelpdrinks
      stopfriendsgoodgoodgoodwhistleswoontongue
      smokeclappingcraydeclarederisivedon-t_mentiondownload
      heatirefullaugh1mdameetingmoskingnegative
      not_ipopcornpunishreadscarescaressearch
      tauntthank_youthisto_clueumnikacuteagree
      badbeeeblack_eyeblum3blushboastboredom
      censoredpleasantrysecret2threatenvictoryyusun_bespectacled
      shokrespektlolprevedwelcomekrutoyya_za
      ya_dobryihelperne_huliganne_othodifludbanclose
15 comments
do not have any work, in cocam, cocoa in solve

Yes, I also came across this information, a funny phenomenon!
You want to say

I try to talk only about what it seems to me, I know! I don’t know anything about inhibitory electrons in the collider! smile
Author
Did you know that ...

According to the rzelulattas, the ilse-western odongo of an unlysiq unviertiseta is not
zanchneiya, in cocam pokodde pozkolenuyu pumpkins in solva. Galvone Chotby
Preying and slandering bkvuy blya on mset. Osatlynye bkuvy mgout seldovtai
in a flat bsepordyak, all-torn tkest reads without a bream.
Pichriony Egoto, it’s because we don’t make every single pumpkin
otdellenotsi, and everything is solvo only.
You want to say that the collider still can’t work? =)
Why does the electric motor consume current?

"It was decided not to make a single mistake. Twenty corrections were kept, and still on the title page it was printed:" British Encyclopedia. " (c) I. Ilf
causes braking of electrons in the winding

Sorry, I can’t remember, this is from which section of the TOE?
It may be due to the fact that the more the motor shaft is slowed down, the stronger (due to the increasing time of flight of the armature as a result of its deceleration) the magnetic field of the permanent magnets interferes with the magnetic field created by the windings, and since the field is electromagnetic, the field of permanent magnets causes electron braking in the winding. On the one hand, the emf acts, on the other hand the field of magnets interferes, the result is an increase in the current consumption (with a constant emf - if the power source is powerful) and heating of the windings. not? =)
Dmitrij,
rather, not the reverse, but the response ...

And what is this and where?
Author
rather, not the reverse, but the response ...
the armature turns and at the same time reverse currents occur

if you apply + and - to the terminals of the motor, it will give us as a generator to the same terminals + and - with the same current,

The second statement contradicts the first. Do not forget about the mechanical energy removed or applied to the shaft. If you apply to the terminals, then it will not give us as a generator, it will consume.
the current consumption would be equal to the current that the armature coils consume

The resistance of the winding is reactive (inductive) in nature. But the most correct answer was given to you by Nruter!
Everything is simple here. When a person lifts empty buckets, the muscles are slightly taut. And you pour him water on the go, the muscles tighten ..
I wonder, is it not?

Nothing interesting.
Open the textbook "Theoretical Foundations of Electrical Engineering". Everything is perfectly chewed there.
Giving the load, the revolutions fall and we lose the compensating currents ...

Dima, take the fashionable nonche BLDC electric motor, which is powered by a battery. And, also, instead of the battery - a light bulb ... and twist the shaft scratch And it has an efficiency of ~ 90%
Author
absolutely for everyone, this is a universal law. Just for "non-magnetic" generators need an excitation current.

For example, if you apply + and - to the terminals of the motor, it will give us as a generator to the same terminals + and - with the same current, as a result, the cost of rotation of the armature will be zero (not taking into account friction in the bearings and so on).
If you spin the engine faster, it will already charge the battery.

The speed is higher - the engine works like a generator
The speed drops - the current consumption increases.

Giving the load, the speed drops and we lose the compensating currents ... the current consumption increases. In how.

So, for example, if there were no compensating currents, the motor would take current exactly as if it would be stopped (slightly less, taking into account contact breaks during operation). In short, the current consumption would be equal to the current that the armature coils consume. Pull out the anchor and measure the current on them)))
So, if you slow down such an engine during operation, its current consumption grows and everything is logical, because the law of conservation of energy applies. The more we brake, the more it consumes current,

It is noted that when physical principles and electrical engineering are not known, they say "... that Law of conservation of energy is therefore sho." When they do not know the principles of interaction chemical biologist. objects then say - "information transfer"
This motor with magnets ... is called reversible. But this effect is not with any motors ...
And for example, in order to evaluate the efficiency (Efficiency) of an electric motor, we make a bunch (belt drive) of 2 electric motors. One serves as a generator, and the second (test) as an electric motor, powered by a regulated power source. To the load to the Generator light bulb (and extra R)

We advise you to read:

Hand it for the smartphone ...