» Country homemade Do-it-yourself spring-loaded shutter

Do-it-yourself spring-loaded shutter

Country homemade / Fixtures
Added 41 a comment
Do-it-yourself spring-loaded shutter
Dear visitors of the site, as you probably already guessed, the discussion in this article will focus on creating a spring-loaded shutter for gates built by the author in the country.

Each summer resident knows well how good it is to have a fence with swing gates for driving in a car) And also the gate requires a high-quality shutter, best spring-loaded, as in our case.

This type of constipation will not allow you to leave the gate open, because the spring will surely return it to the groove, and everything will be completely safe.

The creation of this mechanism is quite simple and easy) two segments from the pipe are taken in the form of rings, a metal plate 4 mm, a steel bar 10 mm, and of course a spring.

The author who made this mechanism kindly left a photo report for the followers, as well as a video where he explains the moments of the assembly of the product and its subsequent operation.

And so in order to proceed further, it is necessary to familiarize yourself with the list of necessary materials and tools for work.

Materials
1) 4mm steel plate
2) spring
3) steel bar 10 mm
4) nut
5) bolt
6) wire

Instruments
1) grinder
2) welding machine
3) drill
4) hammer
5) file

And so, for starters, the author gives us drawings and sketches for clarity.

The first thing the master cut off a piece of steel bar.
Then, according to the given dimensions, he cut off a steel plate and welded 2 rings from cuts of a water pipe onto it.
I put it inside, everything went perfectly)
Next, the author welded the plate to the fence, then put the spring on the bolt, also installed the washers and, at the very last moment, welded a bolt to the bolt which will be recharged)

There is one more trick in this mechanism, but it will be shown in the video, we wish you a pleasant viewing.

[media = https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = sJTFvi_C5xY]


This concludes my story, I hope you enjoyed it) Thank you for your attention!
3.5
4
4
7
Added 41 a comment

Add a comment

    • smilesmilesxaxaokdontknowyahoonea
      bossscratchfoolyesyes-yesaggressivesecret
      sorrydancedance2dance3pardonhelpdrinks
      stopfriendsgoodgoodgoodwhistleswoontongue
      smokeclappingcraydeclarederisivedon-t_mentiondownload
      heatirefullaugh1mdameetingmoskingnegative
      not_ipopcornpunishreadscarescaressearch
      tauntthank_youthisto_clueumnikacuteagree
      badbeeeblack_eyeblum3blushboastboredom
      censoredpleasantrysecret2threatenvictoryyusun_bespectacled
      shokrespektlolprevedwelcomekrutoyya_za
      ya_dobryihelperne_huliganne_othodifludbanclose
41 a comment
0
Reply To quote A complaint
The more clumsy and easier the homemade product, the more cod around it ... mosking
0
Reply To quote A complaint
That they are different, this is a no brainer. This is a television tr-ah. There is no 24 century. and 14.5 and even more so.
..... I gave you a link to TV transformers. If you went along it, you should have seen that it had 14 V.
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
Smartphone, your mother! .....)))))))
+2
Reply To quote A complaint
I explained - I am writing from the mmprtphone. This is a feat))))))))
0
Reply To quote A complaint
"Maybe I didn’t paint it in detail, maybe you read poorly ....." blush
Cool ?! Of course I read poorly, it turns out "mrtal“is it rather“ mate ”? Although it was necessary to write“ rewind ”correctly.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Ivan, what are you talking about now? Can you imagine what current is required for a retractor? What is 0.7 A? Light bulb from a flashlight.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Maybe I didn’t paint it in detail, maybe you read poorly .....
I wrote that I WAS a transformer! From the television, from Photon-714, it seems, I took only a huge core with a primary. He wound the winding himself. He made a charger for the car battery. So many did then. And on occasion, I trained 14.5 for the charging mode, as if by car, with a constant knowledge of tension. The battery from this trance sometimes pulled 8 A. And did not warm ...
0
Reply To quote A complaint
TV ULPTsT (I) -59 / 61-II. There is a stabilized voltage of 30 V, a current in the nominal value of 0.7 A. Two consecutive windings are connected to the input of the rectifier. Just about what you need.
These are network trances, and there are also TCEs, some of which also have voltages suitable for those specified by Valery.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
"
That they are different, this is a no brainer. This is a television tr-ah. There is no 24 century. and 14.5 and even more so.
""
Well, for what, it was me who already zaminusil.
"What are you saying, this is necessary. And now they are also burning with them ... blush
"
And you said to yourself, your nature is like that.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
smile Until yesterday, I did not participate in the conversation at all and did not minus anyone. Now, yes, minus, I have every right) To the words of Delausyus, I didn’t minus anyone) But right now he’ll get out ... I’ll love him.)))
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Yes Valery, you ask who is minus? Our Ukrainian correspondent.
It turns out that Dmitry himself zamusunovat
Dmitrij Yesterday, 21:52 -1
There is nothing new under the sun ...))
: smiley: This is probably for disguise so that no one guesses blush
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
A television transformer does not have such a voltage (14.5 volts). There are 6.3, and even if you connect two 6.3 each, it will be 12.6.
Transformers are different, look for example.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Well, not for you to teach me this. Did you do something yourself, or just rip it off?
And how do you understand cars? Did you know that the ignition switch in a car is one of the weak points (burn contacts), and they are more powerful than reed switches. And do not flattery into space, then you figure it out.


ZZ controls the retractor, which in turn also works like a power relay. It is the power relay that includes starter motor.
The retractor is switched on through a special relay, but only this relay is controlled by the ignition switch))) Contacts of the ЗЗ are illuminated precisely because there is no relay between the retractor and ЗЗ (on very old machines).
0
Reply To quote A complaint
"
blush Well, not for you to teach me this. Did you do something yourself, or just rip it off?
And how do you understand cars? Did you know that the ignition switch in a car is one of the weak points (burn contacts), and they are more powerful than reed switches. And do not flattery into space, then you figure it out.

Valery. "
A television transformer does not have such a voltage (14.5 volts). There are 6.3, and even if you connect two 6.3 each, it will be 12.6.
The current is working, also not big. A retractor from KAMAZ for 24 volts will not work, rather you had a 12 volt coil. It will be silk, but there will be no "strength".
Yes Valery, you ask who is minus? Our Ukrainian correspondent.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
No, for him it’s fantastic)) How to use the buttons to control the rover for horseradish kilometers? Fantasy!))

It is interesting how, in his understanding, the automobile stratum turns on, and such a huge starting current is required there! And everything works through the ignition: laughing:: satisfied:
0
Reply To quote A complaint
PS. And who is minus, for example, I did not understand ....
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
Padon for the mistakes. The smartphone is not for my fingers and eyes)))). Then fix it .... Now I smoke at a construction site ....
+2
Reply To quote A complaint
And you did not know that a relay can be controlled by a relay ')))))))
Why are the relays "phone"? In the army, on the qzle connection, are there just some good ones?))))))) By the way, he also took 24 volts there .... There they are fully operational - a lot of equipment from this network works.
... As for the summer house then, he mr. the transformer itself is from a television. He pressed at me 14.5. I charged them with batteries. For the cotton retractor was enough.
For sashes made catchers from arched plates. Then with your foot you gouge it and you release the sash.
Therefore, he demolished it later - the idea seemed interesting and simple, but in its embodiment too hemorrhoid and not convenient to use.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
It makes no sense to argue, it is clear who is here and minus. He didn’t do it himself, I say it again and he is thirty years old, and not yesterday. And this idea has long been used in the private sector, in various ways. Starting from the usual heck ... The main thing is UNIQUE, do you even know the meaning of this word?
It draws 24 volts from the KAMAZ and has a decent working current. A powerful source is required. What micro button, which reed switch? What are the phone jacks?
The gates opening under their own weight are not fixed and will be "foul" from weight and wind. Need one more fixture for fixation. Open via the Internet? Better through the Japanese ambassador, called and opened.
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
For example, opening by code
And he did it. And also from the retractor. True, a box with eleven reels turned out to be cumbersome))))). Sequentially pressing certain numbers included a chain of “sticking” relays, the retractor opened, the door was repelled by a spring and an open reed switch “washed off” the sticky reels. Did in the army. They even gave me a vacation for him ....))))
You can, of course, come up with "more technological", but it was the 91st year .... And I did it from what I collected on the communication center.
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
I "muddied" .... Previously, in the country there were swing gates, in which I specially installed a "jamb" during installation - they swing open under their own weight, it was only necessary to open the lock. The retractor acted as this lock. And it was powered from the remote control through a relyushka. The only inconvenience is that later, when you enter, first close one leaf, lock it with the pin down, then close the second (they "catch" with the retractor, and then DO NOT FORGET to lift the pin, otherwise only half will open the next time))))))).
... Then he demolished it - it’s not convenient that they themselves do not close. Built retractable with automation ....
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
There is nothing new under the sun ...))

The idea is not new, but he did himself how it turned out. Crooked, askew, but its therefore unique)
You yourself have recently eaten up for some kind of drill (or something similar ...).
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
yes, cool, a hundred times there was such an idea when I looked at the retractor) The truth did not know why. But such a powerful, brutal. You can generally stir up serious electronics ... For example, opening by code, but the best thing is through the Internet))
Yes, and in general this is a cool power unit, you can stir up hosh)
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Quote: Dmitrij
A great tool to open the gate from the outside.
.

But I like it better, for example, the retractor and the micro-button from KamAZ, where the thread is in a secret place ... Well, either a reed switch and a magnet ... Yes, a lot of things come to mind .... That's just a piece wires.... N-no !!!!
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
Why keep it that way? What did he do? It’s here that the “Learn to rip off” forum, since it’s T.O.
It’s nice to be noble, really. No need to be an engineer, do what you understand. Details can be called in different ways (finger, shaft, shaft, shaft axis ...) but the sleeve ?! What are we arguing about here?
There is no creativity here, there is no new idea here (old and old again), it is not clear what.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Yes, why did you hang on to a person, take a look at the video, kid 12 years old)) Well done, keep it up! A great tool to open the gate from the outside.
For the internal version, you can of course and easily simplify) Type "G" shaped shutter.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
pogranecif it was something really interesting, unusual, useful or beautiful, then it would be possible to ignore some flaws, but when a rusty (and, by the way, non-working) piece of iron in addition to extraneous drawings and the "left" link give out for something worthy of attention, then what should we - praise for it?
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
I agree with your position ON THE BIG SCORE. If I see that a person, trying to convey the essence, uses the terms he coined, he simply indicates to him what this is actually called. Without any “learn materiel” and “don’t get involved if you don’t understand” ... (As, for example, in the article about “rosettes”, which are actually called mounting boxes. But the person conveyed the essence)))))) .
Why did I write "by and large"? Because, in this particular article, “crooked performance” is also displayed. If, for example, I wrote it, relying on the same source, I would definitely use phrases such as "The author claims that he did such and such, although it is clear what needs to be done so, and so and so ... ")))))
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
So relying on this clumsy home-made someone will do better.
+3
Reply To quote A complaint
Delausyusam and Ivan_Pokhmelev
Do not forget that the master is not necessarily an engineer, designer or has a technical background. Often these are ordinary people. Sometimes their homemade products are devoid of any practical task, just for the soul. Many homemade products are repeated, but they are made by hand. Yes, it’s simply impossible to know everything. It happens that you yourself come to the store, you’ve called the spare part all your life and everyone called it that way, but no, it’s differently designated in the store. Therefore, I say if a critical error is of course necessary to indicate, and if instead of "wire" is written "failure" then .... Yes, many people have lived and used it all their lives, do not even know what the "wire" is.
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
What he did not make is "stopudovo!" This can be seen by the rust (picked up the finished one, which has been lying around for years), and by the fact that he "first welded, and then came up"))))). If I cooked, I would put it on the pin and grab it. And he himself does not know this - he never cooked))))
.... I agree somewhere with Pohmelev. Simply, he looks more at the quality of the article itself, and I look at the essence of what has been done. It happens that it is described clumsily, with "transboits" and "boksitka", but the homemade product itself is interesting ...
... Not in this case !!!
0
Reply To quote A complaint
pogranec. Yes, nothing will come. With this one must be born. This "deadbolt" is already thirty years old and was made by him (deadbolt), his "close" relative. And the offspring decided to show off here, tore off the "little idea", but he succeeded clumsily.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Ivan, I completely agree with you. But this is rather our way of life (Russian). “And it will do so,” “Somehow,” “Stop-Lyap,” “And what do you need most?” .....
Correctly evaluated and korbenzkol. I wanted to write the same thing. And what is there to admire? This ugly deadbolt? What is the author’s idea? In the spring? Or on the wire? It's old.Or what has been done with crooked hands (and I'm most sure that he didn’t do this)? Most likely, the author himself then screwed the secret "wand" on the other end to the wire. And the circuit, as he could, "skaryavil". And people like him will "pass" him, that is, for them this is the norm. And so it goes.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
If you carefully read the comments again, you will see that it was not me who began to find fault with illiteracy, but korbenzkol, for which he was "awarded" three minuses. This surprised me: a man tells the truth, and his face in the mud.
But I agree with him, because because of such "" and "Protons" "over the hill" flew, and the trains went off the rails, and the ships sank.
Do you think that you can write nonsense in articles, but you cannot point to them. Your right - you can not specify. ;)
And, if the article is rewritten, then the reference - to the studio!
+2
Reply To quote A complaint
Ivan_Pokhmelev,
You read as you want, I do not mean it. I agree with Valery that you should not pay attention to every little thing. If the article is rewritten, then Alex can not draw his scheme. Yes, the author confuses the sleeve with the rod (rod, shutter can be called differently), but the principle of operation is clear from the diagram. Clumsy execution, so experience will come the main desire is.
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
Well, to be honest, I don’t pay attention to the “wire”, “baksitka”, “transboute”, and even to “brake” the cars ..... If you bother with this, you can weed out many “home-grown Kulibins” .... But here is another ...
Not only is the design “beaten up”, but also its embodiment is such that it is fit to be ashamed, not brag.))))))
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
That is, you want me to read, as in Vinokur’s miniature about the opera singer: “here we play, we don’t play here, here I wrapped the fish”? If the author places a drawing, he agrees with him, otherwise why would he put it here. However, he put in all sorts of random pictures related to the theme of "Hasp". In the video, if someone did not watch, the young boy shows the described product in action, and the spring does not return the deadbolt, you need to help with your hand. So, the kid uses these very terms: “sleeve” and “wire”.
+1
Reply To quote A complaint
I re-read the article again. The article says "wire." Plugs just do not see. If you are for the drawing, as I understand it, it was not Alex who drew. It bothers me that when I click on the "source" link, a page with a Yandex photo pops up.
0
Reply To quote A complaint
I am surprised by those who have minus. korbenzkol right: to call a rod a "sleeve", and a wire - a "wire" - this is technical illiteracy.
+3
Reply To quote A complaint
Then, according to the given dimensions, he cut off a steel plate and welded on it 2 rings from cuts of a water pipe .....
... ..... I waited for a month to rust ... I took a picture! ...
I put it inside, everything went perfectly)

... But where did something come up ??? What fit there? You can hammer one more such pin into these pipes! )))))

..And in general, the general impression of the gate and gate valve .... Well, how can I tell you ...?
.... Now, if they had gathered old blackened boards of different sizes and with bent nails, and of them a very convenient little bench was knocked down with slate nails!))))
.... The same impression would be ...
0
Reply To quote A complaint
Made clumsily, and the author is technically illiterate.

DIY categories

We advise you to read:

Hand it for the smartphone ...