I would like to immediately clarify that we are talking about an engine, that is, a motor device that converts any energy (gasoline, electricity ...) into translational motion by interacting with the gravitational field surrounding us. A bit of history. I began to study the theory of gravity in my school years when I realized that modern science did not really know anything about this. I entered the university at the physics department and successfully graduated from it. He worked as a designer of electronic equipment and at the same time received a diploma of a patent specialist and metrologist, then perestroika, no matter what he did, continued to collect all possible information, read everything that he could reach and set up experiments by checking pieces of information put together - so the resulting theory has empirical roots. When the understanding of the current processes became complete, I began to turn, mainly via the Internet, to our pundits we managed to find addresses (pay attention to almost all articles on any serious topic without a return address) but there was no answer from anyone. As a result, kind people , I was told that there are many theories and in order to prove its viability it is necessary that it at least explain the processes taking place in the universe. I had to do astronomy, fussed with half a year, somewhat reworked the theory, everything fell into place. Negotiations started again, and again there was a kind person who suggested that the theory is good but not enough, but if I am able to create a device based on my theory that even if it doesn’t fly but without mass ejections and wheel drives will itself move in the chosen direction then it will be one hundred percent proof and then ...
The most difficult thing was to choose on the basis of what to make such a device - although hands grow from where you need it but opportunities ... Hiking to a flea market began with a search for what might suit. I settled on two options as the most affordable - on a solid active body and on a liquid, surfing the Internet in parallel to he will be convinced that no one did this so that they would not be accused of plagiarism, thank God for three months while he was making a cart on gravel traction, he did not find anything.
It turned out such a design with such giblets. You can see in more detail:
As you probably saw, the trolley runs and runs quite cheerfully, not like eating creeping inertioids despite poorly centered gears and the absence of bearings. The internal structure of the converter itself is very simple took several pictures when disassembling
Two balls run in a circle in a system with a displaced center (which is very clearly seen from the traces of oil). The explanation is also elementary. It is easy to understand. The line С-Д divides the movement of balls into two phases. If we trace the movement from point C, then the ball starts to move with acceleration — the circumference of the segments increases — at a constant speed of rotation of the central shaft, while stick 1 presses the ball while accelerating it and pushing away from it like a boat with an oar from the water, creating a thrust upward momentum the second ball moves with deceleration as the circumference of the segments decreases, while the ball presses on the stick 3 creating a thrust impulse again upwards. That is, when the balls move, thrust is generated in one direction. The second half does not suitable for compensating for the effect of a helicopter. After a year I came across an article on the website (type in Google) A GRAVITALLY INERTIAL ENGINE is POSSIBLE, which describes three device options, one of which is very similar to mine, with the only difference being that the question is posed - is it possible I already built. posted on YouTube. No one was interested. Another version of the gravure of the trolley, built on the basis of a liquid working fluid, did not even expose, and by the chance and breakdown of the computer all the photos and records were lost. The first phase - this can’t be because it can never be - I already felt it on myself. And the good people again say - This is nonsense, take a loan to build a flying model then ... You can try to build, but there are big doubts that even then it will change a lot. Because the forums are mostly chatter, there were those who said that he was a turner and that he would spit for him to create a model, but as soon as it came to help they were suddenly lost. And where I simply can’t imagine where to find sponsors for such a thing. there are studies with a higher mass conversion coefficient and with a change in traction in the selected direction at constant speeds for planar devices. Here is another confirmation of the correctness of my thoughts.
Not quite what I have but still - the address is visible. The question remains - And if the developer of the new is not a research institute containing hundreds of people and eating millions from the state. budget, and a loner is the state or whoever needs it. Strange, but in my life I made the most money on innovations - I was the first to master a technology or master a new technique. True, this is not a trifle, and everyone feels that there is nothing serious yet, the state is silent, and if there are obvious successes ......... After all, in recent years, experimenting, I noticed several very interesting effects related to gravity, say control the rate of natural radiation decay. Say nonsense, and dig around on the Internet and easily find the results of experiments in which the same device on different parallels of the earth gives different results significantly exceeding the statistical error, and the difference in the levels of the gravitational field is minuscule. Maybe for some it will sound blasphemy, but the acceleration of gravity at different parallels is different, but slightly different. with the last argument I propose to recall that the atomic bomb dropped by the Americans on the moon did not explode, and this experiment was by no means fools.
In one of the experiments, I managed to get more than 20 percent weight loss by an object in a certain chamber. And what kind of change is possible in military affairs ...
And here is the answer to the letter that I sent to the President of Russia with a proposal to continue development at the state level - from which it follows directly that they and only SCIENTISTS will decide whether this is necessary for the state, and those who don’t even understand what the movement is about or rather where does it come from. Try to find at least on the Internet at least in textbooks the answer to the question - whya spinning top is stabilized in space, because this phenomenon has been studied and is widely used, at least in gyroscopes. And there are many such questions, my model also refers to them. From here I recall Krylov’s fable - how things are not useful, the prices without knowing her, the ignoramus about her is all good for the worse ....
Simply put, they kicked off, and it’s not surprising if no one can explain why and due to what the model is moving, but you can fantasize like the floor had a slope of as much as one two three degrees and therefore, due to vibration, the model got three kilos weighing in three seconds 10 km an hour or lament that there are not enough measurements taken with the help of special instruments that a simple person simply can’t have at home, and on the basis of this, we conclude that this is an optical illusion and you should not pay attention to it . But most of all, this is similar to the conclusion of the Inquisition which, and only it, can explain everything, and if it cannot be explained, it simply cannot be in principle, and it is not worth looking in that direction.
Well, the last, for those who want to repeat the design and make sure it is working. First, discard the balls as a working fluid for the simple reason that due to rotation during movement, the mass conversion coefficient is too low. Best weight on a telescopic (one or two guides) rods with small wheels at the edges, to reduce drag during movement. Ideally, you can provide for the sliding on the surface of the liquid or oil sprayed in front of the load. I see a lot of improvement options.
But the mathematical justification for this version of the engine. The calculation was made based on the calculation according to the physical formula of centrifugal force. And next, a device was calculated with realistic dimensions and a mass of 10 kilograms of cargo, the diameter of the working area is slightly less than a meter, so R1 is 0.5 meters and R2 is 0.4 meters at 10 revolutions per second ( this is 600 rpm), not so much when you consider that conventional low-speed electric motors make about 1000 rpm. I apologize in advance if something is wrong .....
Well, the thrust with such modest sizes and masses was not a little more than 78 876.8 newtons with a dimension of kg meter per second (a little more than 78 tons). Try to recount yourself, and suddenly I made a mistake because the numbers turned out to be very solid. And this is only with one half of the engine. If you are going to recreate this or a similar engine, write, I will tell you some nuances that I discovered and without which you might not be able to call it. You can call it whatever you like - an inertioid, an inertial engine, or like I am a gravity engine it doesn’t matter.
And one more little appendix. Some comrades call my construction an inertioid, it comes either from ignorance of the material, or from natural dullness. The fact is that in the inertioid there are two pulses in each period, one in the direction of traction and the other smaller in the opposite direction or just impulse of braking. In my design, despite its prostate, there is no reverse or inhibitory impulse, therefore it can be called an engine. Of course, you can call it an impulse, but then you will have to call an internal combustion engine as an impulse, and for some reason it doesn’t occur to anyone .
The most difficult thing was to choose on the basis of what to make such a device - although hands grow from where you need it but opportunities ... Hiking to a flea market began with a search for what might suit. I settled on two options as the most affordable - on a solid active body and on a liquid, surfing the Internet in parallel to he will be convinced that no one did this so that they would not be accused of plagiarism, thank God for three months while he was making a cart on gravel traction, he did not find anything.
It turned out such a design with such giblets. You can see in more detail:
As you probably saw, the trolley runs and runs quite cheerfully, not like eating creeping inertioids despite poorly centered gears and the absence of bearings. The internal structure of the converter itself is very simple took several pictures when disassembling
Two balls run in a circle in a system with a displaced center (which is very clearly seen from the traces of oil). The explanation is also elementary. It is easy to understand. The line С-Д divides the movement of balls into two phases. If we trace the movement from point C, then the ball starts to move with acceleration — the circumference of the segments increases — at a constant speed of rotation of the central shaft, while stick 1 presses the ball while accelerating it and pushing away from it like a boat with an oar from the water, creating a thrust upward momentum the second ball moves with deceleration as the circumference of the segments decreases, while the ball presses on the stick 3 creating a thrust impulse again upwards. That is, when the balls move, thrust is generated in one direction. The second half does not suitable for compensating for the effect of a helicopter. After a year I came across an article on the website (type in Google) A GRAVITALLY INERTIAL ENGINE is POSSIBLE, which describes three device options, one of which is very similar to mine, with the only difference being that the question is posed - is it possible I already built. posted on YouTube. No one was interested. Another version of the gravure of the trolley, built on the basis of a liquid working fluid, did not even expose, and by the chance and breakdown of the computer all the photos and records were lost. The first phase - this can’t be because it can never be - I already felt it on myself. And the good people again say - This is nonsense, take a loan to build a flying model then ... You can try to build, but there are big doubts that even then it will change a lot. Because the forums are mostly chatter, there were those who said that he was a turner and that he would spit for him to create a model, but as soon as it came to help they were suddenly lost. And where I simply can’t imagine where to find sponsors for such a thing. there are studies with a higher mass conversion coefficient and with a change in traction in the selected direction at constant speeds for planar devices. Here is another confirmation of the correctness of my thoughts.
Not quite what I have but still - the address is visible. The question remains - And if the developer of the new is not a research institute containing hundreds of people and eating millions from the state. budget, and a loner is the state or whoever needs it. Strange, but in my life I made the most money on innovations - I was the first to master a technology or master a new technique. True, this is not a trifle, and everyone feels that there is nothing serious yet, the state is silent, and if there are obvious successes ......... After all, in recent years, experimenting, I noticed several very interesting effects related to gravity, say control the rate of natural radiation decay. Say nonsense, and dig around on the Internet and easily find the results of experiments in which the same device on different parallels of the earth gives different results significantly exceeding the statistical error, and the difference in the levels of the gravitational field is minuscule. Maybe for some it will sound blasphemy, but the acceleration of gravity at different parallels is different, but slightly different. with the last argument I propose to recall that the atomic bomb dropped by the Americans on the moon did not explode, and this experiment was by no means fools.
In one of the experiments, I managed to get more than 20 percent weight loss by an object in a certain chamber. And what kind of change is possible in military affairs ...
And here is the answer to the letter that I sent to the President of Russia with a proposal to continue development at the state level - from which it follows directly that they and only SCIENTISTS will decide whether this is necessary for the state, and those who don’t even understand what the movement is about or rather where does it come from. Try to find at least on the Internet at least in textbooks the answer to the question - whya spinning top is stabilized in space, because this phenomenon has been studied and is widely used, at least in gyroscopes. And there are many such questions, my model also refers to them. From here I recall Krylov’s fable - how things are not useful, the prices without knowing her, the ignoramus about her is all good for the worse ....
Simply put, they kicked off, and it’s not surprising if no one can explain why and due to what the model is moving, but you can fantasize like the floor had a slope of as much as one two three degrees and therefore, due to vibration, the model got three kilos weighing in three seconds 10 km an hour or lament that there are not enough measurements taken with the help of special instruments that a simple person simply can’t have at home, and on the basis of this, we conclude that this is an optical illusion and you should not pay attention to it . But most of all, this is similar to the conclusion of the Inquisition which, and only it, can explain everything, and if it cannot be explained, it simply cannot be in principle, and it is not worth looking in that direction.
Well, the last, for those who want to repeat the design and make sure it is working. First, discard the balls as a working fluid for the simple reason that due to rotation during movement, the mass conversion coefficient is too low. Best weight on a telescopic (one or two guides) rods with small wheels at the edges, to reduce drag during movement. Ideally, you can provide for the sliding on the surface of the liquid or oil sprayed in front of the load. I see a lot of improvement options.
But the mathematical justification for this version of the engine. The calculation was made based on the calculation according to the physical formula of centrifugal force. And next, a device was calculated with realistic dimensions and a mass of 10 kilograms of cargo, the diameter of the working area is slightly less than a meter, so R1 is 0.5 meters and R2 is 0.4 meters at 10 revolutions per second ( this is 600 rpm), not so much when you consider that conventional low-speed electric motors make about 1000 rpm. I apologize in advance if something is wrong .....
Well, the thrust with such modest sizes and masses was not a little more than 78 876.8 newtons with a dimension of kg meter per second (a little more than 78 tons). Try to recount yourself, and suddenly I made a mistake because the numbers turned out to be very solid. And this is only with one half of the engine. If you are going to recreate this or a similar engine, write, I will tell you some nuances that I discovered and without which you might not be able to call it. You can call it whatever you like - an inertioid, an inertial engine, or like I am a gravity engine it doesn’t matter.
And one more little appendix. Some comrades call my construction an inertioid, it comes either from ignorance of the material, or from natural dullness. The fact is that in the inertioid there are two pulses in each period, one in the direction of traction and the other smaller in the opposite direction or just impulse of braking. In my design, despite its prostate, there is no reverse or inhibitory impulse, therefore it can be called an engine. Of course, you can call it an impulse, but then you will have to call an internal combustion engine as an impulse, and for some reason it doesn’t occur to anyone .