» Electronics »Automatic circuit breaker

Automatic circuit breaker



One late autumn evening, I broke into the country (tired of my wife, probably). He turned on the switch and the light in the living room - a bright flash, and all the lamps (ordinary incandescent) burned out. I went to look for a multimeter. Bah, I have 285 V in my network! And if "0" were burned out at the substation, all 380 V would be mine! What would happen if I didn’t turn off the switch and leave the refrigerator or TV plugged in? In the best case, they would have burned down. And so a fire could occur due to a short circuit. So he sat all evening by candlelight and ate canned food warmed up on Bumblebee (yes, I still have such a device). The problem somehow needs to be solved.

I arrived in the city the next day. I knew that there were devices that cut down the network with increasing voltage. I did not like them at the cost of up to 6,000 rubles. (the price depends on what current they are designed for). In addition, the relay is their executing element - my electronics in the country, while they will turn off the energy.

And if you make yourself such a device based on a high-current triac? I rummaged through the net and found a suitable scheme. I did not like only that the KU208G triac was used as a key. They are very capricious in work, and in terms of power they do not suit me. I decided to replace it with BT 139-800E.127 (it is inexpensive and reliable). At the same time, you need to change the control transistor to ST13003 (which is more suitable for the parameters) and the zener diode to 1N5349BRLG. The resistance power R1 must be increased to 5 W, and the diode VD2 should be changed to 1N5408. Then you can squeeze about 10 kW, which is what I need.

The key element is the triac VS1, the control electrode of which transistor VT1 is supplied with a negative voltage. Resistor R5 is used to limit the current. The reference and control voltages are removed from the parametric stabilizer VD1-R1-C1. In a chain with it is a diode VD2, which supplies the control voltage, which varies depending on the voltage in the network.

When the voltage in the network (and, accordingly, on the resistive divider R3-R4-C2) reduces the emitter current of the transistor to zero, the triac closes. Positive feedback built on the R7-VD3 chain gives reliable switching of the transistor. The current through feedback is summed with the current at resistor R3, increasing the voltage at the divider R3-R4-C2. This reliably turns off the transistor and, of course, the triac.

The value of the resistor R3 determines the trip voltage.The value of the resistor R7 is the spread between switching on and off.
To indicate the operating mode at the input and at the output, I decided to put two LED chains. The output chain will also load the triac at idle (then R6 can be excluded).

What is necessary:
1. Soldering iron.
2. A set of electronic components + printed circuit board.
3. The radiator for the triac.
4. Housing for the product.
5. LATR to configure the circuit.
6. Screwdriver, tweezers, scalpel, side cutters.
7. The drill.
8. Multimeter.

Missing (5-watt resistor R1 and triac VS1) I bought in the store "Chip and Dip" for 50 rubles. The remaining parts were in stock. To cool the triac used heatsink HS 304-50. Its area is more than enough. Yes, I bought it in Castorama for 57 rubles. mounting box for the case of the future device.


I drew a printed circuit board in the program Sprint-Layout 6.0.

He printed on an inkjet printer on plain paper mirror, then glued to a piece of fiberglass, suitable sizes. Previously fiberglass was treated with fine sandpaper with detergent Seth. With a Ø1.0 mm drill, I drilled holes for parts and technological holes and washed paper off with warm water.

He drew a printed circuit board with a special marker. Then he placed the board in a solution of ferric chloride for half an hour.

Chlorine iron is difficult to wash off from the hands, so I made a kind of pen from masking tape. Acetone washed off the paint. I drilled the technological holes to the required diameter and soldered the board conductors with a soldering iron. I finished with the board.



The extreme parts of the grounding bar, where there are perpendicular threaded holes for mounting, came up as contactors. I sawed two corners to fix the board to the radiator. The radiator did not fit literally 2 mm into the case. With a drill I cut from two sides on the shelf. With an area of ​​230 square meters / mm, this is not critical.



I removed tides from the bottom of the mounting box with a drill that only interfered.

I fixed a board to the radiator at two corners, and I calculated so that the indicator LEDs could exit through the cover. The triac was mounted on a radiator through paste KPT-8. The base 2 of the triac is connected to the cooling pad, so the contact of the radiator with the input / output contactors is fraught with a short circuit, as well as with the conductors on the board.

Then soldered the remaining parts. Instead of a 20 μF × 25 V capacitor (I just didn’t have it), I put two 10 μF × 50 V in parallel. I soldered the indicator chains so that the LEDs slightly went outside through pre-drilled holes in the cover.

R3 set the average value of the protection threshold. I connected the LATR and the multimeter and made a more fine-tuning. R5 replaced with 10 ohms for the stability of the triac.

I did not have a 28k by 2W R resistor for the output chain with a red LED. I put two in parallel at 56k per 1 watts. The input circuit with a green LED does not affect the operation of the circuit, therefore it is not shown in the circuit.

At a voltage of 180–250 V, both LEDs light up. When the voltage rises to 255 V, the triac turns off the phase (only one green LED is lit). The triac again applies the phase to the load when the voltage drops to about 235-240 V.


Dimensions of the structure are 60 x 90 x 90 mm. All openings in the mounting box have been specially opened to improve circuit cooling. Spent on the device a little more than 100 rubles, but several days of work. I think it's worth it!
8.6
9
8.2

Add a comment

    • smilesmilesxaxaokdontknowyahoonea
      bossscratchfoolyesyes-yesaggressivesecret
      sorrydancedance2dance3pardonhelpdrinks
      stopfriendsgoodgoodgoodwhistleswoontongue
      smokeclappingcraydeclarederisivedon-t_mentiondownload
      heatirefullaugh1mdameetingmoskingnegative
      not_ipopcornpunishreadscarescaressearch
      tauntthank_youthisto_clueumnikacuteagree
      badbeeeblack_eyeblum3blushboastboredom
      censoredpleasantrysecret2threatenvictoryyusun_bespectacled
      shokrespektlolprevedwelcomekrutoyya_za
      ya_dobryihelperne_huliganne_othodifludbanclose
207 comments
The problem is not really speed. More precisely, if you put only such a voltage relay, it does not matter what it commutes in, the relay or triac, both will not have time to cope. It is necessary to properly assemble the shield from the very beginning.That is, for each phase and zero from the line, three colors of the arresters for grounding will not damage the spark gap between the phase and zero, but they are now a big problem, some arresters are on sale. And after that, it makes sense to set a voltage relay, and here again it doesn’t matter what switches, since even the relay has time.
Good afternoon, colleague!

With interest, carefully read your article. Collected a lot of similar designs. I wrote my thoughts on further improvement of this device.

On execution I want to say the following. Everything is done efficiently, accurately. The only thing I do not quite understand is the following. You drew the board in Sprint Layout. Not a bad program, I know it well, I work with it, though I have an earlier version. It turned out well. Then you printed the drawing on an inkjet printer. Then transferred to the procurement board. And then they drew with a special marker. I have one, however, I used it only 2 times xaxa After that, beautiful paths turned, only without offense, into not very beautiful ones. Further etching in a solution of ferric chloride. But there is a way. Have you not heard about the method of laser-ironing technology? If there is no laser printer at home, the drawing of the board could be printed at work, with friends or elsewhere. And then, the board would look almost like a factory one. Manual tracing of tracks would disappear. All other operations are similar to those described.
Well no! The load is connected and disconnected by a device made by the Author. A varistor, in parallel with the load, suppresses emissions until the protection has time to work.
R555
Simply parallel to load a circuit is connected from a series-connected varistor and a fuse (automatic machine). Principle of operation. When a surge (excess) voltage, the network varistor breaks through and dampens the surge. A little later, the protective device trips and disconnects the load. When normalizing the mains voltage, the device connects the load
I don’t understand how the parallel circuit will disconnect and connect the load? scratch
However, the disadvantage of protection with a varistor is that after a voltage surge, it is either necessary to replace the fuse, or switch the machine to the operating position.

I propose the idea of ​​a simple refinement of this protective device. Everything remains unchanged. Simply parallel the load turns on the circuit from a series-connected varistor and fuse (automatic machine).
Principle of operation. When a surge (excess) voltage, the network varistor breaks through and dampens the surge. A little later, the protective device trips and disconnects the load. When normalizing the mains voltage, the device connects the load. Varistor in no way interferes with this. Thus, we get a protection speed that surpasses the relay and triac. At the same time, protection has the property of self-healing.
The author of the idea (C) R555 2019.
So, the principle of such protection is as follows. A varistor is connected in parallel with the load. This circuit is connected to the mains via a fuse or circuit breaker. When overvoltage occurs, the varistor breaks through and shorts the wires of the mains. As I said earlier, such varistors withstand short-term huge currents - tens and hundreds of amperes. Therefore, the varistor "takes a hit on itself." The surge is suppressed. During this time, the fuse blows or the circuit breaker trips. The load is disconnected from the network. Wiring and varistor do not have time to fail. The principle of operation of such a system is described in the relevant literature.
The author correctly writes about the importance of the speed of the protection device. Instead of a relay, a triac is used. But I want to note that the triac also does not differ in special speed, although it surpasses the relay.
An ideal device for surge protection is a varistor. It is a combination of high speed and ability briefly miss huge largest currents. Such varistors can be found in some power supplies and in the so-called "pilots" or network filters, they are called differently. I will describe the principle of operation of this circuit.

We advise you to read:

Hand it for the smartphone ...