» Antennas »A simple but effective indoor antenna for receiving digital television

A simple but effective indoor antenna for receiving digital television


In the distant seventies to make an antenna for a television receiver do it yourself It was a very prestigious affair and pointed to the high level of the master, in our age, stuffed with all kinds of electronics, the age of interest in “self-made” antennas does not subside and many craftsmen make TV antennas themselves. Manufacturers of both industrial equipment and various entrepreneurs have adapted to the changing conditions for receiving television signals by simply connecting modern electronic filling to the standard antenna designs, ignoring the fact that the main thing in the normal operation of any antenna is and will be its interaction and coordination with the receiving signal. What has a zigzag antenna, proposed back in 1961 by engineer Kharchenko.

My house is five kilometers from the transmitting repeater, an outdoor TV antenna requires major repairs and reconstruction, but it’s very difficult for a 67-year-old disabled person to get to the ridge from the old slate roof. I have known the “eight” for a long time and not by hearsay, that's why its room option was chosen until better times. To know the channels on which the multiplexes of my repeater work, I visited the resource, inserted it into the data of my channels and got a sketch with the dimensions of a digital individual antenna.
A simple but effective indoor antenna for receiving digital television


An excellent material for the antenna is copper, for lack of which I went to the trick. There was a meter piece of an old television cable,

with which with a knife

carefully removed the top shell

assembled a copper screen braid into an accordion

and freed from the central core with its sheath. Instead, I stuck an aluminum wire with a diameter of 3 mm of the size I needed,

one end of the braid disappeared

and tightly pulled on an aluminum wire - it turned out a copper bar with a diameter of a little more than 4 mm.

With the pliers,

and square

arched two squares in the form of a figure eight, but he did not bend the last corner yet.

I have preserved a thin TV cable about three meters,

decided to use it to connect the antenna to the TV. At the last sides of the square, I again gathered the braid into an accordion, in the lower corner of the antenna with an awl

made a hole and extended the tip of the cable inside the braid so that it was with the aluminum wire, but two centimeters longer. I removed the upper sheath from the cable by two centimeters, pulled the braid over the aluminum wire along with the cable, twisted the end of the braid with the cable screen and soldered it.

He bent the last corner, tinned the ends of the antenna shortened to 5 millimeters and soldered together. The central wire was soldered to the opposite inner corner of the eight, maintaining a distance of 10 millimeters. The antenna, perfectly matched to the cable, is ready,

a digital antenna can be used in this state; solder the plug at the other end of the cable

to connect to a TV and connect the device to a digital TV set-top box. I suspend our antenna in a convenient place, directing it to the TV tower and tune in so far 10 working channels.
7.9
6.7
6

Add a comment

    • smilesmilesxaxaokdontknowyahoonea
      bossscratchfoolyesyes-yesaggressivesecret
      sorrydancedance2dance3pardonhelpdrinks
      stopfriendsgoodgoodgoodwhistleswoontongue
      smokeclappingcraydeclarederisivedon-t_mentiondownload
      heatirefullaugh1mdameetingmoskingnegative
      not_ipopcornpunishreadscarescaressearch
      tauntthank_youthisto_clueumnikacuteagree
      badbeeeblack_eyeblum3blushboastboredom
      censoredpleasantrysecret2threatenvictoryyusun_bespectacled
      shokrespektlolprevedwelcomekrutoyya_za
      ya_dobryihelperne_huliganne_othodifludbanclose
30 comments
But mirrored or ABV are not resonators.

The metal mirror acts as a reflector. The source of electromagnetic waves is an elementary antenna, a mirror irradiator.

Some of the most famous types of traveling wave antennas are:
wire [2]:
single-wire ("long wire", from the English. Long Wire) or Beverage antenna
two-wire V-shaped (English V-Beam)
rhombic
BS antenna (Eng. Fish Bone - fish bone)
dielectric rod
helical longitudinal radiation
waveguide slotted longitudinal radiation
impedance
leaky wave
T-shout
By device or operating principle, antennas are close to ABV:
log-periodic (all varieties) [3]
"wave channel" [4]
Vivaldi
[quote] [About 120 years ago, / quote] [quote] Probably these AFU textbooks were still under Chapaev and then simply reprinted. [/ quote] Yeah, Pythagoras and others like him lived a long time ago, and therefore their laws (and at the same time and all the rest until the year 2000 inclusive) - consider invalid and cancel, do not republish textbooks! (The main thing is to teach how to correctly tick off the exam tickets)
[quote] And in the era of digital frequency meters, far from everyone knows about the wavelength. [/ quote] This is sad!
So 120 years since the triode had not yet been invented and the transmitters were spark,
The only resonator ball antenna.
The wave on which it was transmitted depended on its length.
For example, a Hertz vibrator. (And now it is called a half-wave vibrator or dipole).
Behind the airship, for example, a wire stretched,
unwinding and unwinding which was set up.
Then they came up with a triode, ACS (antenna matching devices), an oscillating circuit appeared and it became possible to work on a fixed antenna at different frequencies (waves).

Perhaps these AFU textbooks were still under Chapaev and then simply reprinted.

And in the era of digital frequency meters, far from everyone knows about the wavelength.
But mirrored or ABV are not resonators.
alex.kaver,
Antenna - a device designed to emit or receive radio waves

The antenna can be considered as an open oscillatory circuit
I don’t remember what textbooks I studied in AFUs, but somehow there was a perception of the antenna as a resonator, the dimensions are rigidly tied to the frequency (wavelength). And this is the main, the rest is secondary.
Antenna - a device designed to emit or receive radio waves.

Designing (synthesizing) a good antenna is an ambiguous, non-trivial and often difficult task. Therefore, when designing antennas, they compromise, since the antenna should not only provide the desired radiation pattern and given electrical parameters, its design must also be durable, inexpensive, technologically advanced, resistant to environmental influences, maintainable. ( From the wiki)
1) Really working.
2) Useful at home and on the farm.

And now to the antennas:
You can take my word for it, but what kind of antennas I have not seen! Especially touched from the gaskets of the engine block! 1. We really worked, and therefore: 2. They were useful on the farm! It is clear that far from all repeaters they worked! My fighters made detector receivers: an antenna - a bunk metal soldier's bed with rubberized legs, grounding - a heating battery! And it worked, he listened!
Are you on a desert island?
No, everything is simpler, old friends - comrades "there are no others, but those are farther away ...", it’s more difficult to make new ones, I haven’t mastered social networks (I can’t learn new tricks for the old male) ...
3. Partly forgive me can only the most acute lack of communication ...

Are you on a desert island?
pogranec,
since June 17th, and already 464 comments
1. 2.5 months is relatively recent.
2. By the number of comments - I know one suitable word that aptly characterizes such talkers as your humble servant, it’s good that decent people rarely use profanity! smile
3. Partly forgive me can only the most acute lack of communication ...
I’m here recently
since June 17th, and already 464 comments
At the very bottom of the page there are three transitions "About the project", "Payment of homemade products", "Site rules". Check out all three. And in the "Payment of homemade goods" there is still a "Requirement" also read.
The main criteria for homemade products on the site:
I apologize, please tell me, where can I read in more detail about the criteria on the site, otherwise I’ve recently, and already got into trouble, received fair comments!
The main criteria for homemade products on the site:
1) Really working.
2) Useful at home and on the farm.
And now to the antennas:
1) Antenna "nail" - really works (if the signal is large)
2) Nail in the household is useful.
Until I have built such homemade antennas here,
where would be optimized SWR, DN and KND.
The main thing that works. Those. improves reception compared to what it was.
Well, MMANA to help.
there is no big and not difficult program "MMANA"

But for homemade products, this is not necessary.
Sorry, I didn’t understand, it is not necessary to maintain the size of the antennas?
Do not be like "brawler"
God save me!
So in different books and different google the same thing is called differently
I agree about different google, different "experts" write there! smile But in books, as a rule, specialists give the correct definitions that are tied to some parameter (log-periodic, parabolic, wave channel, strip, slot, etc., etc.) I had a teacher at the institute who spoke : "Guys, let's first agree on the terms!" If we call the same subject in different words, we will cease to understand each other!
Regards, Korolev.
Korolev,
Regarding the calculation of antennas:
There is no big and not difficult program "MMANA".
It fit on my diskette, it was launched from it, and it didn’t save the calculation results with it.
You can calculate both the gain and resistance (active and reactive) and the diagram in E and H of almost any conductor configuration, given the underlying surface and antenna height.
But for homemade products this is not necessary.
So in different books and different google the same thing is called differently.
And Google translation from Chinese is about the th.
So who is more correct?
No need to be like a "brawler" :-).
Let's talk about the technique and its performance at home with our own hands.
I think so.
When I figure out how to put something here, maybe I’ll post my products. I don’t need an alien.
respectfully
Alex
In addition to Google, there are also smart books and reference books.
My sincere respect to the person who uses books in the age of universal googling!
And I'm all about "roundness" and "squareness"
But I'm still for the technically correct (book) names and terminology.
Korolev,
In addition to Google, there are also smart books and reference books. And I'm all about the "roundness" and "squareness" and the manufacturability and ease of manufacture. I feel good because DVB broadcasts on 37 and 38 channels. Bandwidth is enough for almost any antenna. But where 23 and 51 channels and the signal is weak, you need to put a more complex antenna.
Wait arrears, sorry. discuss. smile But seriously, then success! And I would like to clarify what specific circumstances led to the need to build an antenna.
Korolev,
I’m doing it right now, and I’m going to lay out my version of such an antenna.
There is a name and a biquadrat (Bi-Quad) and a zigzag and Kharchenko and the "eight"
1. I am about the correct technical name.
decrease in proportion to the meter antenna
Generally, antenna sizes are calculated. And may the Great Google be with you!
There is a name and a biquadrat (Bi-Quad) and a zigzag and Kharchenko and the "eight". I did not write about the name. It makes no sense to simply reduce the antenna of the meter band proportionally and to bend the right angles especially in the GHz range. Kharchenko, it was a forced form because thin wires were used. Just take the wire of the desired length, wrap a little more than 1 turn on a round object, bend it to the calculated distance between the ends, connect the rings. You can also make 1.9 waves from a whole wire (immediately mark the middle) by winding 2 turns. Compared to Kharchenko, such an antenna is easier to manufacture and has an advantage in amplification. It is called "BiLoop".
This is not a biquadrat, this is a zigzag!
It is interesting that the Kharchenko antenna was made over a meter range and several rows of wires were pulled over a double cross on insulators. So it was convenient and cheap. But for the DMV or GSM range, this design does not make sense because the stiffness of the conductor does not require stretching it on insulators. A more effective and simple will be an antenna of the "double circle" type - eight. Two rings of hard wire 4-10 mm. The length of the wire in the ring is approximately 0.95 waves. And then everything is exactly as in the biquadrat.
Quote: Hambaker
To deposit aluminum with copper in the precipitation zone?
What is the rainfall in the room?

Quote: Hambaker
In the UHF range to apply a thin cable to reduce, "splashing" along the path 99% of the signal power from the zigzag itself?
At three meters?
An interesting technological solution. Even two.
From me the repeater is three kilometers away, but alas, because of the terrain, it doesn’t accept a nail. The street had to be raised by 16 meters.
And explain to the nonsense: What for 5 km from the repeater you don’t know what if the senser of the TV tuner allows you to take it all on a regular nail stuck in the center hole of the antenna jack? To deposit aluminum with copper in the precipitation zone? In the UHF range to apply a thin cable to reduce, "splashing" along the path 99% of the signal power from the zigzag itself?
Karl Rothammel is not on you!

We advise you to read:

Hand it for the smartphone ...